Skip to main content

RELEASE-- Board Issues Decision in Browning-Ferris Industries

Office of Congressional and Public Affairs

Board Issues Decision in Browning-Ferris Industries

In a 3-2 decision involving Browning-Ferris Industries of California, the National Labor Relations Board refined its standard for determining joint-employer status. The revised standard is designed “to better effectuate the purposes of the Act in the current economic landscape.”  With more than 2.87 million of the nation’s workers employed through temporary agencies in August 2014, the Board held that its previous joint employer standard has failed to keep pace with changes in the workplace and economic circumstances. 

In the decision, the Board applies long-established principles to find that two or more entities are joint employers of a single workforce if (1) they are both employers within the meaning of the common law;  and (2) they share or codetermine those matters governing the essential terms and conditions of employment. In evaluating whether an employer possesses sufficient control over employees to qualify as a joint employer, the Board will – among other factors -- consider whether an employer has exercised control over terms and conditions of employment indirectly through an intermediary, or whether it has reserved the authority to do so. 

In its decision, the Board found that BFI was a joint employer with Leadpoint, the company that supplied employees to BFI to perform various work functions for BFI, including cleaning and sorting of recycled products. In finding that BFI was a joint employer with Leadpoint, the Board relied on indirect and direct control that BFI possessed over essential terms and conditions of employment of the employees supplied by Leadpoint as well as BFI’s reserved authority to control such terms and conditions.

The Board ordered that within 14 days the ballots that were impounded on April 25, 2014 shall be counted and the appropriate certification issued.

Board Chairman Mark Gaston Pearce was joined by Members Kent Y. Hirozawa and Lauren McFerran in the majority opinion; Members Philip A. Miscimarra and Harry I. Johnson III dissented.  

###

 

 


This email was sent to publisher.au.ceomr@blogger.com using GovDelivery, on behalf of: National Labor Relations Board · 1099 14th Street, NW · Washington, DC 20570 · 866-667-6572 Powered by GovDelivery

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Drupal Answers Weekly Newsletter - Wednesday, December 31, 2014

Top new questions this week: Can I delete old hook_update_N functions? Suppose you have a custom module, and you have hook_update_N() implementations in your .install file. If you have old update functions, and all updates have run in all sites that the module is ... node-update hook-update-n   asked by AyeshK ...

[New post] 8th Class Result 2014 PEC Hafizabad Board

Muhammad Waqas posted: "PEC Hafizabad Board 8th Class Result 2014 expected date is 28th March, 2014 by PEC. Punjab Examination Commission (PEC) will announce 8th class result for Hafizabad Board soon and all the students of Hafizabad Board who are extremely waiting for the resul" New post on Jobs in Pakistan 8th Class Result 2014 PEC Hafizabad Board by Muhammad Waqas ...

[New post] 1st Year (11th Class) Result 2014 BISE Rawalpindi Board

Xaib Aslam posted: "BISERWP board Inter part 1 result expected on 10th October 2014 according our source. students of Rawalpindi board desperately waiting for 11th class result. 1st they upload the 12th class result and after some time they ready for showing the 1st year fin" New post on Jobs in Pakistan 1st Year (11th Class) Result 2014 BISE Rawalpindi Board by Xaib Aslam ...