Business Finance ( ACC501
Assignment #1 solution
Spring-2012
Show your LOVE Please Like us on facebook | Follow on twitter
Assignment #1 solution
Spring-2012
Question No.1 (10 Marks)
ABC Company Limited and XYZ Company Limited are involved
in the manufacturing of Leather
products. Following are the balance sheets of both the
companies for the year 2010.
Balance Sheets
As on 31st December 2010
Particulars ABC Company XYZ Company
Rs. (in millions) Rs. (in millions)
Cash 86 20
Account Receivable 172 27
Inventory 396 45
Total Current Assets 654 92
Net Plant and Equipment 2,735 49
Total Assets 3,389 141
Accounts payable 315 8
Notes payable 232 10
Total Current Liabilities 547 18
Long term debt 532 50
common stock and paid in surplus 510 55
Retained earnings 1800 18
Total owners’ equity 2,310 73
Total Liabilities & Owners’ Equity 3,389 141
Although both the firms are involved in the same kind of
business but their balance sheets represent
a huge difference in their financial strength. As a
finance student, you are required to analyze these
balance sheets by using the common size analysis
technique. Also provide comments on the
liquidity and leverage position of both the companies with
the help of your analysis.
Note: Your
solution should be in the following form of single comparative statement
followed by the
comparative comments regarding the liquidity and leverage
position of both companies.
Comparative Common-Size Balance Sheet
As on 31st December 2010
Particulars ABC Company XYZ Company
Cash XX.XX % XX.XX %
Comparison of Liquidity Position
ABC Company XYZ Company
(comments on the liquidity position of
ABC Company)
(comments on the liquidity position of
XYZ Company)
Comparison of Leverage Position
ABC Company XYZ Company
(comments on the Leverage position of
ABC Company)
(comments on the Leverage position of
XYZ Company)
SOLUTION:
Comparative Common-Size Balance Sheet
As on 31st December 2010
ABC Limited XYZ Limited
Cash 2.54% 14.18%
Account Receivable 5.08% 19.15%
Inventory 11.68% 31.91%
Total Current Assets 19.30% 65.25%
Net Plant and Equipment’s 80.70% 34.75%
Total Assets 100% 100%
Accounts payable 9.29% 5.67%
Notes payable 6.85% 7.09%
Total current liabilities 16.14% 12.77%
Long term debt 15.70% 35.46%
common stock and paid in surplus 15.05% 39.01%
Retained earnings 53.11% 12.77%
Total owners’ equity 68.16% 51.77%
Total Liabilities & Owners’ Equity 100% 100%
Comparison of Liquidity Position
ABC Company XYZ Company
By looking at the balance sheet of ABC
Company, we can say that the
company is having more current assets
as compared with current liabilities so
the liquidity position of the company is
satisfactory as it is able to meet its
short term obligations. One important
point to note here is that a major
portion of the current assets of the
company is stuck with inventory
(11.68% out of 19.30%) so the
company would not be able to meet its
short-term obligations on quick basis.
The balance sheet of XYZ Company
shows that this company is also having
more current assets as compared with
current liabilities so the liquidity
position of the company is satisfactory
as it is able to meet its short term
obligations. Contrary to ABC Company,
this company has not put a major
portion of the current assets in
inventory (31.91% out of 65.25%) so
the company would be able to meet its
short-term obligations on quick basis
as well.
Comparison of Leverage Position
ABC Company XYZ Company
The balance sheet of ABC Company
shows that the company is not a highly
leveraged company as a reasonable
majority of its assets has been financed
through equity. From the common size
analysis, we can easily observe that the
capital structure of the company shows
that it’s having a mix of 68.16% equity
and 31.84% debt.
The balance sheet of XYZ Company
shows that this company highly
leveraged as compared with ABC
Company as almost half of its assets
are financed through debt. From the
common size analysis, we can easily
observe that the capital structure of the
company shows that it’s having a mix
of 51.77% equity and 48.23% debt.
Question # 2 (10 Marks)
Fawad Farooq is working as Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
in a manufacturing concern. One of his job
responsibilities is to analyze the company’s financial
results every year in order to make necessary
improvements. While analyzing the financial results for
the current year, he noticed that Return on
Equity (ROE) of the company is lower than that of previous
year. He called up Faiq Aslam, the
Finance Manager of the company, to discuss the matter but
Faiq remained failed to provide any
reasonable justification in this regard. Fawad was well
aware of the fact that the technique of Du-
Pont Analysis is widely used to analyze ROE of the company
by looking at its different aspects. He
asked Faiq to provide him with some information and Faiq
presented him the following information
related to the current year and previous years:
Particulars Current Year Previous Year
Total Assets Rs.10,253,000 -
Total Equity Rs. 6,582,000 -
Total Debt Rs. 3,671,000 -
Sales Rs.
5,352,000 Rs.5,250,000
Gross Profit Rs. 3,201,000 Rs.3,198,000
Net Profit Rs. 2,000,000 -
Profit Margin - 52%
Total Assets Turnover - 0.50 times
Equity Multiplier - 1.55 times
You are required to explain (with the help of
calculations) that how CFO will perform the Du-Pont
Analysis by using the above information. Also, indicate
the exact reason of unsatisfactory ROE for the
current year.
Note: You
are required to provide complete calculations along with interpretations.
SOLUTION:
To conduct the Du-Pont Analysis, CFO would break down ROE
into its components as follows:
ROE = Profit Margin x Total Assets Turnover x Equity
Multiplier
ROE = (Net Profit / Sales) x (Sales / Assets) x (Assets /
Equity)
By Using the given information,
ROE = (2,000,000 / 5,352,000) x (5,352,000 / 10,253,000) x
(10,253,000/6,582,000)
ROE = 37% x 0.52 x 1.56
ROE = 30%
After calculations, the results for all three components
are compared to the results of previous year
for the same and it is observed that the only effected
area is Profit Margin. Then, the reason for low
profit margin is investigated by looking at the figures of
Sales and Gross Profit for both years which are
found almost same. So, the only reason that makes sense is
that there is a reasonable fall in net profit.
It can be concluded after conducting the analysis that the
company has incurred a reasonably high
amount of operating and financial charges due to which
there is fall in Net Profit that is leading to low
profit margin. So, the company should cut down its
operating and financial charges in order to improve
its
ROE in coming years.
Show your LOVE Please Like us on facebook | Follow on twitter
Comments
Post a Comment